← Home 📘 Track 2: Mathematics for Quantum Hook Framework Mathematics Interactive Summary
M10 §1 · Complex Numbers ~18 min

Global vs relative phase

In Track 1 you saw interference: two amplitudes that could cancel or reinforce each other. The phase between them was the reason. This lesson is where that reason becomes precise — and where you'll discover that not all phase is the same kind of thing.

✦ One Idea Multiplying a quantum state by $e^{i\varphi}$ (global phase) changes nothing observable — probabilities are unchanged. But changing only one amplitude's phase (relative phase) changes the angle between components, which changes interference, which changes measurement outcomes.
global phase relative phase $e^{i\varphi}$ interference probability superposition
Hook
🪝 Hook

Two states that look completely different in the math — yet are physically identical.

Consider two quantum states. The first is the familiar equal superposition:

$$|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$$

The second looks quite different — every amplitude has been multiplied by $e^{i\pi/4}$ (a rotation of 45° in the complex plane):

$$e^{i\pi/4}|\psi\rangle = \frac{e^{i\pi/4}}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{e^{i\pi/4}}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$$

Both states look different on paper. But here's the question: do they behave differently when you run an experiment? Take a moment to guess before reading on.

⚠️
The surprising answer: they are identical

The probability of measuring $|0\rangle$ in both states is exactly $\frac{1}{2}$. The probability of $|1\rangle$ is also $\frac{1}{2}$ in both. No measurement — not now, not ever — can distinguish these two states from each other. They are physically the same state.

But now change something more subtle. Instead of rotating all amplitudes by the same amount, rotate only the $|1\rangle$ amplitude:

$$|\psi'\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{e^{i\pi/4}}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$$

Now the two states are distinguishable. Measure in a different basis and you will see a different outcome distribution. The phase matters — but only when it is a difference between components.

🔗
This is why interference depends on relative phase

In Track 1 (lessons L10–L15) you saw amplitudes cancel and reinforce each other — that was interference. But why did some combinations cancel and others reinforce? It always came down to the angle between the amplitudes. This lesson gives you the precise mathematical reason: only relative phase (the angle between components) drives interference. Global phase (rotating everything together) is completely invisible to any experiment.

Framework
🗺️ Framework

Global phase rotates the whole state together. Relative phase changes the angle between components.

A quantum state with two amplitudes looks like this:

$$|\psi\rangle = \alpha|0\rangle + \beta|1\rangle$$

Both $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are complex numbers. They each live somewhere on the complex plane — each with a direction (angle) and a magnitude (distance from the origin). The phase of an amplitude is its angle on the complex plane.

Global phase — the whole state rotates together

Multiplying by $e^{i\varphi}$ rotates every amplitude by the same angle $\varphi$. Both $\alpha$ and $\beta$ rotate equally:

$$e^{i\varphi}|\psi\rangle = e^{i\varphi}\alpha|0\rangle + e^{i\varphi}\beta|1\rangle$$

🎡
The clock-hand analogy

Imagine two clock hands of different lengths, both attached to the same center. Global phase rotates the entire clock face — both hands turn together by the same angle. The angle between the two hands (the relative angle) stays exactly the same. From the perspective of the angle between them, nothing has changed.

What determines a measurement probability? The rule from M09: $P = |\alpha|^2 = \alpha \cdot \alpha^*$. Now apply this to $e^{i\varphi}\alpha$:

$$|e^{i\varphi}\alpha|^2 = (e^{i\varphi}\alpha)(e^{i\varphi}\alpha)^* = (e^{i\varphi}\alpha)(e^{-i\varphi}\alpha^*) = e^{0} \cdot \alpha\alpha^* = |\alpha|^2$$

The global phase $e^{i\varphi}$ multiplies by its own conjugate $e^{-i\varphi}$ and cancels to 1. The probability is unchanged. This is not a coincidence — it is a mathematical inevitability, visible in one step.

Relative phase — the angle between components changes

Now rotate only the $|1\rangle$ amplitude by $\theta$, leaving $|0\rangle$ untouched:

$$|\psi'\rangle = \alpha|0\rangle + e^{i\theta}\beta|1\rangle$$

The angle between the two components has changed. The individual probabilities $|\alpha|^2$ and $|e^{i\theta}\beta|^2 = |\beta|^2$ are the same as before — but if you measure in a different basis (one that can see the angle between them), you will get a different result. Interference depends on this angle.

🎵
The wave analogy

Two sound waves at the same frequency. Shift both by the same time: they still cancel or reinforce each other exactly as before — the relative timing between them didn't change. But shift only one of them: now their peaks and troughs align differently. The combined sound changes. Relative phase is that relative timing. It determines whether waves reinforce or cancel — whether interference is constructive or destructive.

⚡ Instinct Check Recognising the difference Advisory — won't block you
A state $|\psi\rangle = \alpha|0\rangle + \beta|1\rangle$ is multiplied by $e^{i\pi/3}$ to give $e^{i\pi/3}|\psi\rangle$. What changes?
Mathematics
∑ Derivation

Global phase cancels exactly in every probability calculation. Relative phase survives.

Formal state notation

Let $|\psi\rangle = \alpha|0\rangle + \beta|1\rangle$ where $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{C}$ and $|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1$ (normalization). The probability of measuring $|0\rangle$ is $|\alpha|^2$; the probability of measuring $|1\rangle$ is $|\beta|^2$.

Why global phase is unobservable — the derivation

Apply a global phase $e^{i\varphi}$ to every amplitude. The new state is:

Step 1 — Apply global phase

$$e^{i\varphi}|\psi\rangle = e^{i\varphi}\alpha|0\rangle + e^{i\varphi}\beta|1\rangle$$

Every amplitude in the state is multiplied by the same factor $e^{i\varphi}$.

Step 2 — Compute the probability of $|0\rangle$

The new amplitude for $|0\rangle$ is $e^{i\varphi}\alpha$. Its probability is:

$$P(|0\rangle) = |e^{i\varphi}\alpha|^2 = (e^{i\varphi}\alpha)(e^{i\varphi}\alpha)^*$$

Step 3 — Apply conjugation: $(e^{i\varphi})^* = e^{-i\varphi}$

The complex conjugate of $e^{i\varphi} = \cos\varphi + i\sin\varphi$ is $\cos\varphi - i\sin\varphi = e^{-i\varphi}$. So:

$$(e^{i\varphi}\alpha)(e^{-i\varphi}\alpha^*) = e^{i\varphi}e^{-i\varphi} \cdot \alpha\alpha^* = e^{0} \cdot |\alpha|^2 = |\alpha|^2$$

Result — global phase vanishes completely

$$|e^{i\varphi}\alpha|^2 = |\alpha|^2$$

The same calculation holds for $|1\rangle$: $|e^{i\varphi}\beta|^2 = |\beta|^2$. Neither probability changes. The global phase factor $e^{i\varphi}$ contributes exactly $e^{i\varphi} \cdot e^{-i\varphi} = e^0 = 1$ — it multiplies by one. This is why global phase is physically unobservable: it cannot survive the modulus-squared operation that produces probabilities.

Relative phase survives

Now consider a state with a relative phase $\theta$ on the $|1\rangle$ component:

$$|\psi'\rangle = \alpha|0\rangle + e^{i\theta}\beta|1\rangle$$

Individual probabilities in the standard ($|0\rangle, |1\rangle$) basis:

Standard-basis probabilities with relative phase

$$P(|0\rangle) = |\alpha|^2 \qquad P(|1\rangle) = |e^{i\theta}\beta|^2 = |\beta|^2$$

So far: no change. The relative phase is not yet visible here.

Relative phase appears in interference — the Hadamard example

Apply a Hadamard gate $H$ to the state. $H$ maps: $|0\rangle \to \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle)$ and $|1\rangle \to \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle - |1\rangle)$.

For $|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$ (relative phase $\theta = 0$): after $H$, outcome is $|0\rangle$ with probability 1.

For $|\psi'\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{e^{i\pi}}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$ (relative phase $\theta = \pi$): after $H$, outcome is $|1\rangle$ with probability 1.

Same individual probabilities before measurement. Different interference pattern after $H$. The relative phase $\theta$ made the difference.

⚡ Instinct Check — Pause and think
Is $e^{i\pi/4}|\psi\rangle$ the same physical state as $|\psi\rangle$?

Take a moment before you reveal. Clue: ask whether any measurement outcome distribution changes. That's what "same physical state" means in quantum mechanics.

Yes — physically identical. $e^{i\pi/4}$ is a global phase factor: it multiplies every amplitude in $|\psi\rangle$ by the same value. As shown above, $|e^{i\pi/4}\alpha|^2 = |\alpha|^2$ for every amplitude $\alpha$. No measurement outcome distribution changes. In quantum mechanics, two states that differ only by a global phase factor are considered the same physical state — they are the same ray in the state space. The phase $\pi/4$ here is simply invisible to all experiments.
⚔️ Prediction Battle Compute before revealing
State: $|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$. Is the factor $i$ on the $|1\rangle$ amplitude a global phase or a relative phase? What are the probabilities $P(|0\rangle)$ and $P(|1\rangle)$?

Hint: ask yourself — does the $|0\rangle$ amplitude also carry the factor $i$? If both carry it, it's global. If only one does, it's relative. Then compute each probability using $|\cdot|^2$.

Step 1 — Is it global or relative?
The $|0\rangle$ amplitude is $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ (no factor of $i$). The $|1\rangle$ amplitude is $\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}$ (has a factor of $i$). Since the $|0\rangle$ amplitude does not carry $i$, the $i$ is a relative phase — it changes the angle between the two components.
Step 2 — $P(|0\rangle)$:
$$P(|0\rangle) = \left|\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right|^2 = \frac{1}{2}$$
Step 3 — $P(|1\rangle)$:
$$P(|1\rangle) = \left|\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\right|^2 = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot \frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{-i^2}{2} = \frac{1}{2}$$
Interpretation: The standard-basis probabilities are $\frac{1}{2}$ each — identical to $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$. But measure in the $\{|+\rangle, |-\rangle\}$ basis and the outcomes will differ — the relative phase $i = e^{i\pi/2}$ would be detected. This state is not the same physical state as the one without $i$, even though the standard-basis probabilities match.
⚡ Instinct Check Why global phase cancels in $|\cdot|^2$ Advisory — won't block you
Why does $|e^{i\varphi}\alpha|^2 = |\alpha|^2$ for any real $\varphi$?

Micro practice — three conceptual checks

Concept — What does global phase change?

Nothing that is observable. Every amplitude rotates by the same angle $\varphi$ in the complex plane. Since probability is $|\alpha|^2 = \alpha \cdot \alpha^*$, and the global phase cancels against its own conjugate, no probability changes. No interference pattern changes. No experiment can detect a global phase. Physically, two states that differ by a global phase are the same state.

Prediction — If both amplitudes rotate equally, what happens to probabilities?

They stay the same. Each amplitude's modulus $|\alpha|$ is unchanged by a phase rotation (phase rotation moves the point around a circle, not closer to or farther from the origin). Since probability is $|\alpha|^2$, and $|\alpha|$ does not change, neither does the probability. The equal rotation of both amplitudes means the angle between them also doesn't change — hence interference patterns are also unchanged.

Insight — Why does relative phase affect interference?

Interference depends on whether amplitudes add constructively or destructively — and that depends on the angle between them in the complex plane. A relative phase $\theta$ is exactly that angle: the difference in direction between two complex amplitudes. When $\theta = 0$, the amplitudes point the same way and reinforce. When $\theta = \pi$, they point in opposite directions and cancel. The relative phase is the interference dial.

Interactive
🔬 Phase Explorer

Slide the global phase and watch probabilities stay fixed. Slide the relative phase and watch them shift.

The state starts as $|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$ — the equal superposition you saw many times in Track 1. Use the two sliders to apply a global phase $\varphi$ and a relative phase $\theta$ independently. The probability bars and amplitude vectors update in real time, and the live formula at the bottom shows the exact state you're looking at.

Three things to discover
Step 1 — Global phase is invisible: Drag the φ slider all the way across. The standard-basis probability bars don't move at all — and both arrows on the diagram rotate together, keeping the same angle between them. Nothing measurable changes.

Step 2 — Relative phase changes outcomes: Reset φ to 0, then drag the θ slider. Watch the Hadamard-basis bars respond — the interference pattern shifts. At θ = π the outcomes completely flip.

Step 3 — Read the live state formula: The box at the bottom shows the actual quantum state updating in real time as you drag. Notice that relative phase θ only appears on the $|1\rangle$ component.
🔬 Explorer Global vs relative phase — drag sliders to explore
Amplitude vectors on complex plane
● $\alpha|0\rangle$ amplitude ● $\beta|1\rangle$ amplitude
Global phase φ 0.00π Invisible to measurement
0.00π
Snap:
Relative phase θ 0.00π Affects interference
0.00π
Snap:
Standard-basis probabilities
$P(|0\rangle)$ 50.0%
$P(|1\rangle)$ 50.0%
Hadamard-basis probabilities (relative phase visible here)
$P(|{+}\rangle)$ 100.0%
$P(|-\rangle)$ 0.0%
Drag the global phase slider — watch the standard-basis bars stay fixed.
Live quantum state
Loading…
Angle between amplitudes: 0.00π
Global phase φ rotates both arrows together — the angle between them stays the same.
Circuit connection: Every phase gate you'll use — the S gate ($+90°$), the T gate ($+45°$), the Z gate ($+180°$) — works by changing only the relative phase of one amplitude. Now you know exactly what that means.
Lesson Summary

Three things you now own — and why they matter for every interference calculation.

  • 🌀
    Global phase is physically unobservable

    Multiplying every amplitude by $e^{i\varphi}$ changes nothing measurable. The factor cancels in $|e^{i\varphi}\alpha|^2 = e^{i\varphi}e^{-i\varphi}|\alpha|^2 = |\alpha|^2$. Two states that differ only by a global phase are the same physical state — they occupy the same ray in state space. No experiment distinguishes them.

  • 📐
    Relative phase changes interference — and is observable

    Rotating only one amplitude's phase changes the angle between the two components. That angle determines whether they reinforce or cancel when combined in a measurement. Standard-basis probabilities $|\alpha|^2$ and $|\beta|^2$ may look unchanged — but measure in a basis that is sensitive to this angle and the difference appears. Relative phase is the interference dial.

  • 🔗
    This is why Track 1's interference patterns depended on phase

    In Track 1, amplitudes cancelled or reinforced based on how they were combined — that was interference. The reason was always relative phase: the angle between the amplitudes in the complex plane. When you run a quantum circuit, gates like the Hadamard and phase gate manipulate relative phase precisely. Understanding global versus relative phase is the foundation for understanding every quantum gate that exploits interference.

  • ⚙️
    Every phase gate in quantum circuits works this way

    The S gate adds $\frac{\pi}{2}$ to the $|1\rangle$ amplitude's phase. The T gate adds $\frac{\pi}{4}$. The Z gate adds $\pi$ (which flips the sign of $|1\rangle$). All of these are relative phase operations — they rotate exactly one amplitude while leaving the other untouched. Now you know what that actually means in the complex plane.

How confident do you feel about global versus relative phase right now?
Quick Check 4 questions — global phase, relative phase, interference, observability

You now know that only differences in phase matter.
The next step: complex numbers as vectors.
Adding them, taking inner products — the machinery of quantum states.

→ Complex vectors and inner products — M11
Sources & Further Reading
  • Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. — Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge, 2000. §1.2: Global phase and the state space postulate. §2.2.5: The phase kickback mechanism.
  • Preskill, J. — Lecture Notes for Physics 229, Caltech, 1998. Chapter 2: Rays in Hilbert space; why global phase is unphysical. Available online
  • Wilde, M. M. — Quantum Information Theory, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 2017. §3.1: Pure states and global phase equivalence.
  • IBM Qiskit Textbook — Single Qubit Gates. Phase gates and the role of relative phase in interference circuits. Available online